diff options
author | Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> | 2015-11-19 15:50:09 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> | 2015-11-19 16:07:02 +0000 |
commit | fe93077fc235073200c471a387c27261bfc20eb7 (patch) | |
tree | 6b0769ed297e50cce84a9e0f75a35d5078e1c706 /main/hostapd | |
parent | 3d3cd382227f735072e0721ce23155af42297b69 (diff) | |
download | aports-fe93077fc235073200c471a387c27261bfc20eb7.tar.bz2 aports-fe93077fc235073200c471a387c27261bfc20eb7.tar.xz |
main/hostapd: upgrade to 2.5
Diffstat (limited to 'main/hostapd')
9 files changed, 5 insertions, 442 deletions
diff --git a/main/hostapd/0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch b/main/hostapd/0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 91627fb7b7..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,73 +0,0 @@ -From dd2f043c9c43d156494e33d7ce22db96e6ef42c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:37:45 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH 1/5] EAP-pwd peer: Fix payload length validation for Commit - and Confirm - -The length of the received Commit and Confirm message payloads was not -checked before reading them. This could result in a buffer read -overflow when processing an invalid message. - -Fix this by verifying that the payload is of expected length before -processing it. In addition, enforce correct state transition sequence to -make sure there is no unexpected behavior if receiving a Commit/Confirm -message before the previous exchanges have been completed. - -Thanks to Kostya Kortchinsky of Google security team for discovering and -reporting this issue. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -index f2b0926..a629437 100644 ---- a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -+++ b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -@@ -355,6 +355,23 @@ eap_pwd_perform_commit_exchange(struct eap_sm *sm, struct eap_pwd_data *data, - BIGNUM *mask = NULL, *x = NULL, *y = NULL, *cofactor = NULL; - u16 offset; - u8 *ptr, *scalar = NULL, *element = NULL; -+ size_t prime_len, order_len; -+ -+ if (data->state != PWD_Commit_Req) { -+ ret->ignore = TRUE; -+ goto fin; -+ } -+ -+ prime_len = BN_num_bytes(data->grp->prime); -+ order_len = BN_num_bytes(data->grp->order); -+ -+ if (payload_len != 2 * prime_len + order_len) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected Commit payload length %u (expected %u)", -+ (unsigned int) payload_len, -+ (unsigned int) (2 * prime_len + order_len)); -+ goto fin; -+ } - - if (((data->private_value = BN_new()) == NULL) || - ((data->my_element = EC_POINT_new(data->grp->group)) == NULL) || -@@ -554,6 +571,18 @@ eap_pwd_perform_confirm_exchange(struct eap_sm *sm, struct eap_pwd_data *data, - u8 conf[SHA256_MAC_LEN], *cruft = NULL, *ptr; - int offset; - -+ if (data->state != PWD_Confirm_Req) { -+ ret->ignore = TRUE; -+ goto fin; -+ } -+ -+ if (payload_len != SHA256_MAC_LEN) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected Confirm payload length %u (expected %u)", -+ (unsigned int) payload_len, SHA256_MAC_LEN); -+ goto fin; -+ } -+ - /* - * first build up the ciphersuite which is group | random_function | - * prf --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch b/main/hostapd/0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 5dca20b277..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,66 +0,0 @@ -From e28a58be26184c2a23f80b410e0997ef1bd5d578 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:40:44 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH 2/5] EAP-pwd server: Fix payload length validation for Commit - and Confirm - -The length of the received Commit and Confirm message payloads was not -checked before reading them. This could result in a buffer read -overflow when processing an invalid message. - -Fix this by verifying that the payload is of expected length before -processing it. In addition, enforce correct state transition sequence to -make sure there is no unexpected behavior if receiving a Commit/Confirm -message before the previous exchanges have been completed. - -Thanks to Kostya Kortchinsky of Google security team for discovering and -reporting this issue. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -index 66bd5d2..3189105 100644 ---- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -+++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -@@ -656,9 +656,21 @@ eap_pwd_process_commit_resp(struct eap_sm *sm, struct eap_pwd_data *data, - BIGNUM *x = NULL, *y = NULL, *cofactor = NULL; - EC_POINT *K = NULL, *point = NULL; - int res = 0; -+ size_t prime_len, order_len; - - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Received commit response"); - -+ prime_len = BN_num_bytes(data->grp->prime); -+ order_len = BN_num_bytes(data->grp->order); -+ -+ if (payload_len != 2 * prime_len + order_len) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected Commit payload length %u (expected %u)", -+ (unsigned int) payload_len, -+ (unsigned int) (2 * prime_len + order_len)); -+ goto fin; -+ } -+ - if (((data->peer_scalar = BN_new()) == NULL) || - ((data->k = BN_new()) == NULL) || - ((cofactor = BN_new()) == NULL) || -@@ -774,6 +786,13 @@ eap_pwd_process_confirm_resp(struct eap_sm *sm, struct eap_pwd_data *data, - u8 conf[SHA256_MAC_LEN], *cruft = NULL, *ptr; - int offset; - -+ if (payload_len != SHA256_MAC_LEN) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected Confirm payload length %u (expected %u)", -+ (unsigned int) payload_len, SHA256_MAC_LEN); -+ goto fin; -+ } -+ - /* build up the ciphersuite: group | random_function | prf */ - grp = htons(data->group_num); - ptr = (u8 *) &cs; --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch b/main/hostapd/0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 4d2f9d8aef..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,52 +0,0 @@ -From 477c74395acd0123340457ba6f15ab345d42016e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 19:23:04 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH 3/5] EAP-pwd peer: Fix Total-Length parsing for fragment - reassembly - -The remaining number of bytes in the message could be smaller than the -Total-Length field size, so the length needs to be explicitly checked -prior to reading the field and decrementing the len variable. This could -have resulted in the remaining length becoming negative and interpreted -as a huge positive integer. - -In addition, check that there is no already started fragment in progress -before allocating a new buffer for reassembling fragments. This avoid a -potential memory leak when processing invalid message. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c | 12 ++++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -index a629437..1d2079b 100644 ---- a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -+++ b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -@@ -866,11 +866,23 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void *priv, struct eap_method_ret *ret, - * if it's the first fragment there'll be a length field - */ - if (EAP_PWD_GET_LENGTH_BIT(lm_exch)) { -+ if (len < 2) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, -+ "EAP-pwd: Frame too short to contain Total-Length field"); -+ ret->ignore = TRUE; -+ return NULL; -+ } - tot_len = WPA_GET_BE16(pos); - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Incoming fragments whose " - "total length = %d", tot_len); - if (tot_len > 15000) - return NULL; -+ if (data->inbuf) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected new fragment start when previous fragment is still in use"); -+ ret->ignore = TRUE; -+ return NULL; -+ } - data->inbuf = wpabuf_alloc(tot_len); - if (data->inbuf == NULL) { - wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, "Out of memory to buffer " --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch b/main/hostapd/0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 7edef099eb..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ -From 3035cc2894e08319b905bd6561e8bddc8c2db9fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 19:26:06 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH 4/5] EAP-pwd server: Fix Total-Length parsing for fragment - reassembly - -The remaining number of bytes in the message could be smaller than the -Total-Length field size, so the length needs to be explicitly checked -prior to reading the field and decrementing the len variable. This could -have resulted in the remaining length becoming negative and interpreted -as a huge positive integer. - -In addition, check that there is no already started fragment in progress -before allocating a new buffer for reassembling fragments. This avoid a -potential memory leak when processing invalid message. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c | 10 ++++++++++ - 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -index 3189105..2bfc3c2 100644 ---- a/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -+++ b/src/eap_server/eap_server_pwd.c -@@ -942,11 +942,21 @@ static void eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void *priv, - * the first fragment has a total length - */ - if (EAP_PWD_GET_LENGTH_BIT(lm_exch)) { -+ if (len < 2) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, -+ "EAP-pwd: Frame too short to contain Total-Length field"); -+ return; -+ } - tot_len = WPA_GET_BE16(pos); - wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, "EAP-pwd: Incoming fragments, total " - "length = %d", tot_len); - if (tot_len > 15000) - return; -+ if (data->inbuf) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, -+ "EAP-pwd: Unexpected new fragment start when previous fragment is still in use"); -+ return; -+ } - data->inbuf = wpabuf_alloc(tot_len); - if (data->inbuf == NULL) { - wpa_printf(MSG_INFO, "EAP-pwd: Out of memory to " --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch b/main/hostapd/0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch deleted file mode 100644 index a601323f14..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,32 +0,0 @@ -From 28a069a545b06b99eb55ad53f63f2c99e65a98f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 19:26:28 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH 5/5] EAP-pwd peer: Fix asymmetric fragmentation behavior - -The L (Length) and M (More) flags needs to be cleared before deciding -whether the locally generated response requires fragmentation. This -fixes an issue where these flags from the server could have been invalid -for the following message. In some cases, this could have resulted in -triggering the wpabuf security check that would terminate the process -due to invalid buffer allocation. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c | 1 + - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) - -diff --git a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -index 1d2079b..e58b13a 100644 ---- a/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -+++ b/src/eap_peer/eap_pwd.c -@@ -968,6 +968,7 @@ eap_pwd_process(struct eap_sm *sm, void *priv, struct eap_method_ret *ret, - /* - * we have output! Do we need to fragment it? - */ -+ lm_exch = EAP_PWD_GET_EXCHANGE(lm_exch); - len = wpabuf_len(data->outbuf); - if ((len + EAP_PWD_HDR_SIZE) > data->mtu) { - resp = eap_msg_alloc(EAP_VENDOR_IETF, EAP_TYPE_PWD, data->mtu, --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/APKBUILD b/main/hostapd/APKBUILD index 69e0b25279..c2474c8d25 100644 --- a/main/hostapd/APKBUILD +++ b/main/hostapd/APKBUILD @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # Maintainer: Natanael Copa <ncopa@alpinelinux.org> pkgname=hostapd -pkgver=2.4 -pkgrel=1 +pkgver=2.5 +pkgrel=0 pkgdesc="daemon for wireless software access points" url="http://hostap.epitest.fi/hostapd/" arch="all" @@ -13,14 +13,6 @@ subpackages="$pkgname-doc" patches=" musl-fix-types.patch CVE-2012-4445.patch - 0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch - 0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch - 0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch - 0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch - 0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch - CVE-2015-1863.patch - CVE-2015-4141.patch - CVE-2015-4142.patch " @@ -92,42 +84,18 @@ package() { || return 1 } -md5sums="04578f3f2c3eb1bec1adf30473813912 hostapd-2.4.tar.gz +md5sums="69f9cec3f76d74f402864a43e4f8624f hostapd-2.5.tar.gz 7568486221987c93041b4877eced7317 musl-fix-types.patch 0d01d4641e0c33f79c1f4372613655bf CVE-2012-4445.patch -87d611a9b704402f66fa59ba1458928d 0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch -bafcec421e4f5c6a8383893d029a79e5 0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch -fa2aed3cf49f7e6c7b17bf9db9a001f5 0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch -de0fca4d74a1883d15ef5754f13a5226 0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch -9d854969af23b207f9f3dff38ef78770 0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch -8e8c34267fefcc4142ee142e5515b5df CVE-2015-1863.patch -222ec96a8dc73c41608cc463beac3966 CVE-2015-4141.patch -d3688697f81ca1e684a79dfa3682a111 CVE-2015-4142.patch 29b561d4ee34dc22a8a0ae0bf1db5c45 hostapd.initd c91382209042defa04e79d0ae841a29e hostapd.confd" -sha256sums="6fe0eb6bd1c9cbd24952ece8586b6f7bd14ab358edfda99794e79b9b9dbd657f hostapd-2.4.tar.gz +sha256sums="8e272d954dc0d7026c264b79b15389ec2b2c555b32970de39f506b9f463ec74a hostapd-2.5.tar.gz f296013d432740478f24de7214d07ff897e6e38cbfd01a73a3158014f94fd771 musl-fix-types.patch 06dc7df2159fb0604191f66d35164caa5927963eebe77b5f2c389bd7590e2a49 CVE-2012-4445.patch -a204bc37f52e5346780a306c01706689eb46263dedcdcb1eb2f4c0b291a0db93 0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch -298fc3b89f987922fb2600d0c95e8c868d6da30d24643748afd47bcd30da7b44 0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch -2fd42fb53be793c54343aa18a84afebe4603aa6ce8b6969ad6b3a8d327c6b142 0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch -c28ca6303a562809dfd1812f9b918808b3b0f0c52cc43070fd1777e1cfc88f18 0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch -04ef66fbd5b2167274cd7123d7f7252963b9a9c1ec2f5edf6558a6ad92d47689 0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch -a3abf75801f02199ff48c316a7b6598860e6ca20ce2fe79b0bec873905e5c8a4 CVE-2015-1863.patch -eb63d845fdc38b6310c527ad1705b6fe3b74f90e263188da2aca97468cc55142 CVE-2015-4141.patch -cc6c488afab4ccfdaedd9e224989b5fe713d6b0415ea94579190bd8ba60c9be5 CVE-2015-4142.patch cae79127d088c047c1460d5b63eb67da1a830eb725a8c95e50070e516ad02800 hostapd.initd 6c14e88b14bb9a93d2dca69239d829f435e93180e621319aeed0f3987290dfba hostapd.confd" -sha512sums="37e648fe9cce92923ab1d1e23a4267e274c988785d7be5610f1affca425ffa86b438de81e37446926a0f9158d6b67ee83e6396c3f81d571545c973dddbf1ffe3 hostapd-2.4.tar.gz +sha512sums="bbb0547c29f4925aff8639cae3291ed020c2a9d989dd267be831b2418880916d2ec69003e36ecc796c348476086397cca8f63c52633f91c11a9c2ab72e1c83c0 hostapd-2.5.tar.gz 6ccdca29bc3a6b87d6e3f581c4f4725f0684bb88f39d46f875e9bdb0c41ee5b8be3b7908084c6631bffddece82cb2f2222e159d842944b6f2b7b639ef2de609c musl-fix-types.patch 619acce84516dead1e03e5da71657ea4c4b6f3ca8271574409773aeb316cbddc88095b50320804f457f001f4f3fe83053e660c008d8409f59bb4d3bfe058b601 CVE-2012-4445.patch -9440f8d9d18d20b95d236c1a4467d86dfbbc17d8f26b0caa48d6737c6231d1ff14793c6fc8a1e4508f3ad38c9a5d710fd49b85c7de16634dbe6685af05f44f7c 0001-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Commi.patch -0887017bfdb4632baa49bb849b732eed7eec9a498247fdd5ef8448e4a6df10380c06d68fa706e0b2624c04eb6f5a327cdb71c5c71c3476dc383f889ee7372702 0002-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-payload-length-validation-for-Com.patch -341901aa94c44ae725b6d4dddac2a52b6457234189554fc282c9cf5fa0254125d7323553a7b8118f9a3e2020f039267ed4c912f84ac6f2cb12670b40c28ac652 0003-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment-r.patch -b752f91c3d6dcf0784d9cb20a0c7f8de6c837c38ff62cf77b136d9b818890b13f55eeed1d6097f244181b480be953e1bdfb5651116dc5d62a2d02c018e19042a 0004-EAP-pwd-server-Fix-Total-Length-parsing-for-fragment.patch -07a21f0cc7d00e17bed8ef5ced36159020a410a4606aa0ca24e47223835ab0cc5fbeed3075c4f17d2ce1aee437eedf9fea8f4b95252b2fa255d54a195637cb6f 0005-EAP-pwd-peer-Fix-asymmetric-fragmentation-behavior.patch -61f90d06bd42fb7ea17ba147db861303f5b1fdce2cda35492cec578214da5ea5d654a1df99dee4d4a0c07ef3e8b3bfb65ab4b98eff21c2013adf536766136ce1 CVE-2015-1863.patch -4633a96a91e151407e4c62b74b4e78d37e4fba586278c6ae4340ce149bee0c644a4d62675256839c3130374a4dc7531beaeed8282946e7dcd3faf1ed74bf99be CVE-2015-4141.patch -dc561d90f3f329ebb201abbb53eea161603fb2abba6b2fc5c79298d97c84f2d65d401608cd7bb2fb82abf909661c56699bf4bcbf902f6f8c7d5b1853b0277353 CVE-2015-4142.patch b54b7c6aa17e5cb86a9b354a516eb2dbefb544df18471339c61d82776de447011a2ac290bea1e6c8beae4b6cebefafb8174683ea42fb773e9e8fe6c679f33ba3 hostapd.initd 0882263bbd7c0b05bf51f51d66e11a23a0b8ca7da2a3b8a30166d2c5f044c0c134e6bccb1d02c9e81819ca8fb0c0fb55c7121a08fe7233ccaa73ff8ab9a238fe hostapd.confd" diff --git a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-1863.patch b/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-1863.patch deleted file mode 100644 index de1964ca76..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-1863.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@ -From 9ed4eee345f85e3025c33c6e20aa25696e341ccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> -Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 11:32:11 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH] P2P: Validate SSID element length before copying it - (CVE-2015-1863) - -This fixes a possible memcpy overflow for P2P dev->oper_ssid in -p2p_add_device(). The length provided by the peer device (0..255 bytes) -was used without proper bounds checking and that could have resulted in -arbitrary data of up to 223 bytes being written beyond the end of the -dev->oper_ssid[] array (of which about 150 bytes would be beyond the -heap allocation) when processing a corrupted management frame for P2P -peer discovery purposes. - -This could result in corrupted state in heap, unexpected program -behavior due to corrupted P2P peer device information, denial of service -due to process crash, exposure of memory contents during GO Negotiation, -and potentially arbitrary code execution. - -Thanks to Google security team for reporting this issue and smart -hardware research group of Alibaba security team for discovering it. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> ---- - src/p2p/p2p.c | 1 + - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) - -diff --git a/src/p2p/p2p.c b/src/p2p/p2p.c -index f584fae..a45fe73 100644 ---- a/src/p2p/p2p.c -+++ b/src/p2p/p2p.c -@@ -778,6 +778,7 @@ int p2p_add_device(struct p2p_data *p2p, const u8 *addr, int freq, - if (os_memcmp(addr, p2p_dev_addr, ETH_ALEN) != 0) - os_memcpy(dev->interface_addr, addr, ETH_ALEN); - if (msg.ssid && -+ msg.ssid[1] <= sizeof(dev->oper_ssid) && - (msg.ssid[1] != P2P_WILDCARD_SSID_LEN || - os_memcmp(msg.ssid + 2, P2P_WILDCARD_SSID, P2P_WILDCARD_SSID_LEN) - != 0)) { --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4141.patch b/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4141.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 36b4ca2946..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4141.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -From 5acd23f4581da58683f3cf5e36cb71bbe4070bd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 17:08:33 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH] WPS: Fix HTTP chunked transfer encoding parser - -strtoul() return value may end up overflowing the int h->chunk_size and -resulting in a negative value to be stored as the chunk_size. This could -result in the following memcpy operation using a very large length -argument which would result in a buffer overflow and segmentation fault. - -This could have been used to cause a denial service by any device that -has been authorized for network access (either wireless or wired). This -would affect both the WPS UPnP functionality in a WPS AP (hostapd with -upnp_iface parameter set in the configuration) and WPS ER -(wpa_supplicant with WPS_ER_START control interface command used). - -Validate the parsed chunk length value to avoid this. In addition to -rejecting negative values, we can also reject chunk size that would be -larger than the maximum configured body length. - -Thanks to Kostya Kortchinsky of Google security team for discovering and -reporting this issue. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/wps/httpread.c | 7 +++++++ - 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/wps/httpread.c b/src/wps/httpread.c -index 2f08f37..d2855e3 100644 ---- a/src/wps/httpread.c -+++ b/src/wps/httpread.c -@@ -533,6 +533,13 @@ static void httpread_read_handler(int sd, void *eloop_ctx, void *sock_ctx) - if (!isxdigit(*cbp)) - goto bad; - h->chunk_size = strtoul(cbp, NULL, 16); -+ if (h->chunk_size < 0 || -+ h->chunk_size > h->max_bytes) { -+ wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, -+ "httpread: Invalid chunk size %d", -+ h->chunk_size); -+ goto bad; -+ } - /* throw away chunk header - * so we have only real data - */ --- -1.9.1 - diff --git a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4142.patch b/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4142.patch deleted file mode 100644 index 79c5af8906..0000000000 --- a/main/hostapd/CVE-2015-4142.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,41 +0,0 @@ -From ef566a4d4f74022e1fdb0a2addfe81e6de9f4aae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 -From: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> -Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 02:21:53 +0300 -Subject: [PATCH] AP WMM: Fix integer underflow in WMM Action frame parser - -The length of the WMM Action frame was not properly validated and the -length of the information elements (int left) could end up being -negative. This would result in reading significantly past the stack -buffer while parsing the IEs in ieee802_11_parse_elems() and while doing -so, resulting in segmentation fault. - -This can result in an invalid frame being used for a denial of service -attack (hostapd process killed) against an AP with a driver that uses -hostapd for management frame processing (e.g., all mac80211-based -drivers). - -Thanks to Kostya Kortchinsky of Google security team for discovering and -reporting this issue. - -Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi> ---- - src/ap/wmm.c | 3 +++ - 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) - -diff --git a/src/ap/wmm.c b/src/ap/wmm.c -index 6d4177c..314e244 100644 ---- a/src/ap/wmm.c -+++ b/src/ap/wmm.c -@@ -274,6 +274,9 @@ void hostapd_wmm_action(struct hostapd_data *hapd, - return; - } - -+ if (left < 0) -+ return; /* not a valid WMM Action frame */ -+ - /* extract the tspec info element */ - if (ieee802_11_parse_elems(pos, left, &elems, 1) == ParseFailed) { - hostapd_logger(hapd, mgmt->sa, HOSTAPD_MODULE_IEEE80211, --- -1.9.1 - |