aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch')
-rw-r--r--community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch24
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch b/community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 08692abf16..0000000000
--- a/community/chromium/musl-fix-getrlimit-failed.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:51:29 -0600
-From: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
-Subject: Re: getrlimit failed (chromium on musl)
-
-> Running chromium on a musl system spams this message:
->
-> getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE) failed
-
-The problem is that the sandbox blocks prlimit64 with EPERM, but musl
-only falls back to getrlimit on ENOSYS. The diff below will fix the
-error. From the linked bug, the only reason it is blocked in the first
-place is ChromeOS, and this change should be fine even there.
-
---- content/common/sandbox_linux/bpf_renderer_policy_linux.cc.orig
-+++ content/common/sandbox_linux/bpf_renderer_policy_linux.cc
-@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
- case __NR_sched_setscheduler:
- return sandbox::RestrictSchedTarget(GetPolicyPid(), sysno);
- case __NR_prlimit64:
-- return Error(EPERM); // See crbug.com/160157.
-+ return Error(ENOSYS); // See crbug.com/160157.
- default:
- // Default on the content baseline policy.
- return SandboxBPFBasePolicy::EvaluateSyscall(sysno);