1 files changed, 0 insertions, 64 deletions
diff --git a/main/libc0.9.32/0019-libcrypt-make-crypt-itself-more-modular.patch b/main/libc0.9.32/0019-libcrypt-make-crypt-itself-more-modular.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 9e8636f95a..0000000000
--- a/main/libc0.9.32/0019-libcrypt-make-crypt-itself-more-modular.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-From 78f25c8abfc3358a46061772944d30027ceb8288 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:21:33 -0600
-Subject: [PATCH] libcrypt: make crypt() itself more modular
-
-By using a function table, we can more cleanly support new crypt
-implementations, such as SHA256 ($5$) and SHA512 ($6$).
-
-Signed-off-by: William Pitcock <nenolod@dereferenced.org>
-Signed-off-by: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
-(cherry picked from commit 40c426ae8f032d794d15f4a7fca8dc17cdc9899d)
----
- libcrypt/crypt.c |   30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
- 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/libcrypt/crypt.c b/libcrypt/crypt.c
-index 89a2614..33f98b6 100644
---- a/libcrypt/crypt.c
-+++ b/libcrypt/crypt.c
-@@ -8,17 +8,35 @@
- #define __FORCE_GLIBC
- #include <crypt.h>
- #include <unistd.h>
-+#include <string.h>
-+#include <errno.h>
- #include "libcrypt.h"
- 
-+typedef char *(*crypt_impl_f)(const unsigned char *pw, const unsigned char *salt);
-+
-+static const struct {
-+	const char *salt_pfx;
-+	const crypt_impl_f crypt_impl;
-+} crypt_impl_tab[] = {
-+	{ "$1$",        __md5_crypt },
-+	{ NULL,         __des_crypt },
-+};
-+
- char *crypt(const char *key, const char *salt)
- {
- 	const unsigned char *ukey = (const unsigned char *)key;
- 	const unsigned char *usalt = (const unsigned char *)salt;
-+	size_t i;
-+
-+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(crypt_impl_tab); i++) {
-+		if (crypt_impl_tab[i].salt_pfx != NULL &&
-+		    strncmp(crypt_impl_tab[i].salt_pfx, salt, strlen(crypt_impl_tab[i].salt_pfx)))
-+			continue;
-+
-+		return crypt_impl_tab[i].crypt_impl(ukey, usalt);
-+	}
- 
--	/* First, check if we are supposed to be using the MD5 replacement
--	 * instead of DES...  */
--	if (salt[0]=='$' && salt[1]=='1' && salt[2]=='$')
--		return __md5_crypt(ukey, usalt);
--	else
--		return __des_crypt(ukey, usalt);
-+	/* no crypt implementation was found, set errno to ENOSYS and return NULL */
-+	__set_errno(ENOSYS);
-+	return NULL;
- }
--- 
-1.7.8
-