aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/community/elixir
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.5gmile2018-05-081-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: fix checksums againJakub Jirutka2018-03-311-1/+0
| | | | I'm deeply sorry, I was too rashed. :(
* community/elixir: fix checksumJakub Jirutka2018-03-311-1/+1
| | | | Mistake in rebasing PR.
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.4gmile2018-03-312-87/+2
|
* community/elixir: add note about patch removalgmile2018-03-161-0/+1
|
* community/elixir: fix TODOgmile2018-03-161-4/+1
|
* community/elixir: fix build under Erlang 20.3gmile2018-03-162-1/+87
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.3gmile2018-03-111-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.2gmile2018-02-281-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.1gmile2018-02-131-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: disable check on aarch64Sören Tempel2018-01-201-0/+4
|
* community/elixier: add checkSören Tempel2018-01-202-2/+28
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.6.0gmile2018-01-201-5/+3
|
* [various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDXJakub Jirutka2017-12-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.5.3gmile2017-12-271-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.5.2gmile2017-10-031-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.5.1gmile2017-08-051-3/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.5.0gmile2017-07-281-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.4.5Roberto Oliveira2017-07-071-2/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.4.4Francesco Colista2017-06-161-4/+5
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.4.2Mario Mainz2017-04-041-4/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.4.1Pavel Vesnin2017-02-081-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.3.4Daniel Sabogal2016-11-041-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: fix indentation in abuildJakub Jirutka2016-08-161-3/+2
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.3.2Aaron Jensen2016-08-161-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.3.1Marlus Saraiva2016-07-121-17/+8
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.2.6Francesco Colista2016-06-071-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: upgrade to 1.2.5Marlus Saraiva2016-05-041-4/+4
|
* main/elixir: new upstream version 1.2.4Christian Kampka2016-04-021-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: Update to 1.2.1Marlus Saraiva2016-01-191-4/+4
|
* community/elixir: move from mainNatanael Copa2015-10-151-0/+40