aports - Main aports tree

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	community/neovim: bump pkgrel, rebuild against unibilium 2.0	Jean-Louis Fuchs	2018-02-27	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/neovim: ignore st terminfo cursor shape	Jean-Louis Fuchs	2018-02-09	2	-1/+24
\| \| \| \| \|	Fixes a crash that started to appear with the ncurses 6.0_p20171125-r0 update.
*	[various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDX	Jakub Jirutka	2017-12-30	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
*	community/neovim: upgrade to 0.2.2	Jakub Jirutka	2017-11-19	1	-2/+2
\|
*	community/neovim: upgrade to 0.2.1	Jakub Jirutka	2017-11-08	1	-2/+2
\|
*	community/neovim: fix secfixes comment	Natanael Copa	2017-07-20	1	-2/+2
\|
*	community/neovim: enable on ppc64le	Shiz	2017-05-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/neovim: disable on s390x	Shiz	2017-05-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/neovim: add secfixes	Jakub Jirutka	2017-05-02	1	-4/+9
\|
*	community/neovim: upgrade to 0.2.0	Marvin Steadfast	2017-05-02	1	-6/+2
\|
*	community/neovim: Disable build on ppc64le	Breno Leitao	2017-04-10	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \|	neovim grab an upstream luajit during the compilation process. Luajit from upstream still lack ppc64le support, thus, disabling this package for a while.
*	community/neovim: upgrade to 0.1.7	Jakub Jirutka	2016-11-29	2	-84/+9
\|
*	community/neovim: security fix for CVE-2016-1248	Daniel Sabogal	2016-11-23	2	-5/+84
\| \| \| \|	Patch from Debian unstable (0.1.6-4)
*	community/neovim: move from testing	Jakub Jirutka	2016-11-05	2	-0/+74
\|
*	Revert "community/neovim: move from testing"	Jakub Jirutka	2016-10-01	1	-36/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This reverts commit 0e96c0868c0a9214766cee3b9878079a8a67ed1a. Some dependencies are still in testing. Sorry for that, I should rather go sleep now.
*	community/neovim: move from testing	Jakub Jirutka	2016-10-01	1	-0/+36