aports - Main aports tree

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	community/opam: drop dependency on standalone xz	Leo	2019-11-27	1	-7/+3
\|
*	community/cloudi,dune,haxe,opam: enable s390x	Tuan Hoang	2019-11-25	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/opam: upgrade to 2.0.5	Joe Searle	2019-10-04	1	-2/+2
\|
*	community/opam: upgrade to 2.0.3	Francesco Colista	2019-03-22	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \|	Fixes #10148
*	community/opam: upgrade to 2.0.1	Anil Madhavapeddy	2018-10-25	2	-37/+15
\|
*	aports: add support for armv7 [skip ci]	Oliver Smith	2018-09-24	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This makes it possible to provide armv7 as additional architecture in Alpine, next to armhf. See the discussion in this ML thread: <https://lists.alpinelinux.org/alpine-devel/6271.html> It's done by adding armv7 next to armhf in the arch line and also !armv7 where the arch line said !armhf. The following script was used:
*	community/opam: rebuild with ocaml 4.06.1	Jakub Jirutka	2018-03-10	1	-3/+7
\|
*	community/ocaml-camlp4: add -dev subpkg	Jakub Jirutka	2018-03-09	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/ocaml-camlp4: rename camlp4 to ocaml-camlp4	Jakub Jirutka	2018-03-09	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/opam: modernize abuild	Jakub Jirutka	2018-03-08	1	-7/+5
\|
*	community/opam: fix stubsdir name from stubslibs to stublibs	Jakub Jirutka	2018-03-08	2	-5/+29
\|
*	community/opam: fix missing dependency	Jacques-Pascal Deplaix	2018-02-06	1	-2/+2
\|
*	[various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDX	Jakub Jirutka	2017-12-30	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
*	community/opam: enable build on ppc64le	Roberto Oliveira	2017-07-03	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	Enable build on ppc64le as ocaml and camlp4 are now available.
*	community/[ocaml packages]: disable on ppc64le and s390x again	Shiz	2017-05-13	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \|	It seems s390x and ppc64le OCaml builds but is severely broken. Disable these packages until we have a properly working OCaml.
*	Revert "community/[various]: enable on ppc64le due ocaml"	Shiz	2017-05-13	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \|	It seems ppc64le OCaml does compile but is severely broken. Disabling these again until we have a working OCaml.
*	community/[various]: enable on ppc64le due ocaml	Shiz	2017-05-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/opam: ocaml not avail on ppc64le	Leonardo Arena	2017-04-05	1	-2/+2
\|
*	community/opam: disable on 32bit archs	Natanael Copa	2016-12-03	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/opam,camlp4: disable on x86	Natanael Copa	2016-12-02	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/ocaml: mark ocaml as !x86 instead of deps	Anil Madhavapeddy	2016-12-02	1	-1/+1
\|
*	community/opam: move from testing to community	Anil Madhavapeddy	2016-12-02	1	-0/+38