aports - Main aports tree

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	main/boost: bump dependent aports	Andy Postnikov	2018-03-28	1	-1/+1
\|
*	[various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDX	Jakub Jirutka	2017-12-30	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.8.1	Roberto Oliveira	2017-12-29	1	-3/+3
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: rebuild against readline-7.0.003	Leonardo Arena	2017-06-05	1	-1/+1
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.8	Matthieu Monnier	2017-06-02	1	-9/+5
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.7.7	Sören Tempel	2016-11-02	1	-25/+25
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: rebuild against boost 1.62.0	Natanael Copa	2016-10-27	1	-1/+1
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: rebuild against libressl	Natanael Copa	2016-10-10	1	-2/+2
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: move from unmaintained and version bump to 0.7.5	Matthieu MONNIER	2016-09-05	1	-0/+45
\|
*	testing/[multiple]: move unmaintained packages	Carlo Landmeter	2016-08-25	1	-44/+0
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This moves all packages from testing to unmaintained which have not been updated for atleast 6 months. If you are affected by this commit please follow this proceddure: * make sure your packages build on all architectures * move your pacakge(s) back to testing * if you want to keep this package and can maintain it (or find somebody to maintain it for you) for a minimum of 6 months ask it to be moved to community
*	testing/ncmpcpp: rebuild against boost-1.60	Natanael Copa	2016-02-02	1	-1/+1
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.6.8	Sören Tempel	2015-11-22	1	-4/+4
\| \| \| \| \|	Not upgrading to 0.7.0 directly since this version requires boost.locale unconditionally which doesn't seem to be packaged at the moment.
*	testing/ncmpcpp: rebuild against boost-1.59	Natanael Copa	2015-11-10	1	-1/+1
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.6.7	Sören Tempel	2015-10-06	1	-9/+21
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: specify license	Fabian Affolter	2013-11-20	1	-3/+5
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.5.10	Bartłomiej Piotrowski	2012-07-09	1	-8/+7
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.5.8	Natanael Copa	2011-11-04	1	-2/+2
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.5.7	Natanael Copa	2011-06-08	1	-2/+2
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: upgrade to 0.5.6	Natanael Copa	2011-02-04	1	-2/+2
\|
*	Set all packages with arch="x86 x86_64" to arch="all".	William Pitcock	2011-01-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	testing/*: add arch	Natanael Copa	2010-12-13	1	-0/+1
\|
*	testing/ncmpcpp: build fix	Natanael Copa	2010-12-02	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	needs openssl
*	testing/ncmpcpp: new aport	Natanael Copa	2010-12-02	1	-0/+30
	An almost exact clone of ncmpc with some new features. http://unkart.ovh.org/ncmpcpp/