aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/testing/sequoia-sqv
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Orphan my packagestcely2019-10-241-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In my experience, this project does not encourage contribution. The people involved with merging have ignored improvements, rewritten commits and history wholesale, and engaged in squabbles over petty things rather than helping to improve the packages. These gatekeepers are adverse to large amounts of changes, large numbers of commits and often request changes to the commit histories without giving explanation. Many times inconsistent suggestions and fixation on nits have caused entire patch sets to be closed without any progress on the package at all. The style "rules" that are so often the sole focus of reviews lately are a mistake. https://gist.github.com/tcely/8ef31809f04a494a27ad79d49afdf167 Given all of this and the conversation below, I consider all of my efforts toward improving this project to have been wasted. Hopefully, this will serve as a warning of what others might expect before they experience similar demoralizing responses. 2019-10-18 11:31:35 <tcely> If your only contribution to a review is to suggest breaking a package I'm maintaining, please don't waste everyone's time! 2019-10-18 12:15:47 <ncopa> tcely: url? 2019-10-18 12:26:56 <tcely> ncopa: !327 2019-10-18 12:29:22 <_ikke_> tcely: No need to be passive aggressive about this 2019-10-18 12:30:20 <_ikke_> tcely: being a maintainer of a package does not mean that you can do whatever you want 2019-10-18 12:30:52 <tcely> _ikke_: I'm fully willing to be direct. This is a stupid upgrade. Stop looking for useless things to argue about it is not a helpful review! 2019-10-18 12:31:19 <_ikke_> tcely: the problem is that there are so many changes in these stupid ugprades 2019-10-18 12:31:35 <_ikke_> if they were stupid upgrades, they would have been long applied 2019-10-18 12:33:10 <tcely> That last statement is false. If you disagree with changes, you need to do the work yourself. Stop shitting all over work you didn't have to think through for petty nonsense. 2019-10-18 12:42:28 <ncopa> can we please calm down 2019-10-18 13:17:46 <ncopa> tcely: i agree with _ikke_ that your commits are not always self explanatory, and a bit confusing to understand 2019-10-18 13:18:13 <ncopa> it may be good to have more explanations in the commit message to help people that are not as smart as you 2019-10-18 13:19:10 <ncopa> there seems also to be a disagreement on the coding style e.g $var vs ${var} 2019-10-18 13:19:43 <ncopa> i think consistence is better than the "perfect" coding style 2019-10-18 13:20:51 <ncopa> and we have landed on $var rather than ${var} 2019-10-18 13:21:46 <ncopa> and we expect maintainers to respect that 2019-10-18 13:25:51 <tcely> Duly noted. You want total control and slave labor with no room for improvement. I'll stop wasting my time.
* testing/sequoia-sqv: upgrade to 0.9.0tcely2019-07-231-8/+3
|
* Revert "testing/sequoia-sqv: disable due to build error with nettle"tcely2019-07-231-2/+2
| | | | This reverts commit 6cf41c6943198e829d44a1d72cc3f5e0b73f8f07.
* testing/sequoia-sqv: disable due to build error with nettleNatanael Copa2019-07-221-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | bindgen-wrapper.h:19:10: fatal error: 'nettle/des-compat.h' file not found bindgen-wrapper.h:19:10: fatal error: 'nettle/des-compat.h' file not found, err: true thread 'main' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: ()', src/libcore/result.rs:999:5
* testing/sequoia-sqv: upgrade to 0.7.0tcely2019-06-022-272/+369
| | | | Closes GH-8348
* testing/sequoia-sqv: new aporttcely2019-04-092-0/+2476
https://sequoia-pgp.org/ A simple signature verification program