From 309e323d10bf9a58a9da59eb60c09079a3c09a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Simon Frankenberger <simon@fraho.eu>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 21:54:02 +0200
Subject: community/openjdk9-11: Move from testing

OpenJDK 9 and 10 may be removed once 11 is built.
---
 community/openjdk10/arm.patch | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 community/openjdk10/arm.patch

(limited to 'community/openjdk10/arm.patch')

diff --git a/community/openjdk10/arm.patch b/community/openjdk10/arm.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e0f65348be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/community/openjdk10/arm.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+--- old/src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_arm/os_linux_arm.cpp
++++ new/src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_arm/os_linux_arm.cpp
+@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@
+ # include <pwd.h>
+ # include <poll.h>
+ # include <ucontext.h>
+-# include <fpu_control.h>
+ # include <asm/ptrace.h>
+ 
+ #define SPELL_REG_SP  "sp"
+@@ -103,6 +102,18 @@
+ #define ARM_REGS_IN_CONTEXT  31
+ 
+ #else
++
++// Stupid hack as the origin if below doesnt compile with gcc 8.2.0:
++//
++// os_linux_arm.cpp:114:5: error: missing binary operator before token "("
++//  #if NGREG == 16
++//       ^~~~~
++//
++// The NGREG is 18, so force it to that value.
++#ifdef NGREG
++#  undef NGREG
++#endif
++#define NGREG 18
+ 
+ #if NGREG == 16
+ // These definitions are based on the observation that until
-- 
cgit v1.2.3