From 21ac993da0a187821e812fe7b5b31a426121a546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Richard W.M. Jones" Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:10:19 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Use C99 standard int64_t instead of OCaml defined (and soon to go) int64. --- libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c b/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c index 3bb572f..06b3852 100644 --- a/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c +++ b/libvirt/libvirt_c_oneoffs.c @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ ocaml_libvirt_connect_node_get_free_memory (value connv) NONBLOCKING (r = virNodeGetFreeMemory (conn)); CHECK_ERROR (r == 0, conn, "virNodeGetFreeMemory"); - rv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64) r); + rv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64_t) r); CAMLreturn (rv); } @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ ocaml_libvirt_connect_node_get_cells_free_memory (value connv, rv = caml_alloc (r, 0); for (i = 0; i < r; ++i) { - iv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64) freemems[i]); + iv = caml_copy_int64 ((int64_t) freemems[i]); Store_field (rv, i, iv); } -- 2.0.4