1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
|
From a9de14175548c04e0f8be7fae219246509ba46a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:13:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ide: Check array bounds before writing to io_buffer
(CVE-2015-5154)
If the end_transfer_func of a command is called because enough data has
been read or written for the current PIO transfer, and it fails to
correctly call the command completion functions, the DRQ bit in the
status register and s->end_transfer_func may remain set. This allows the
guest to access further bytes in s->io_buffer beyond s->data_end, and
eventually overflowing the io_buffer.
One case where this currently happens is emulation of the ATAPI command
START STOP UNIT.
This patch fixes the problem by adding explicit array bounds checks
before accessing the buffer instead of relying on end_transfer_func to
function correctly.
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
hw/ide/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index 122e955..44fcc23 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -2021,6 +2021,10 @@ void ide_data_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 2 > s->data_end) {
+ return;
+ }
+
*(uint16_t *)p = le16_to_cpu(val);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2042,6 +2046,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readw(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 2 > s->data_end) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = cpu_to_le16(*(uint16_t *)p);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2063,6 +2071,10 @@ void ide_data_writel(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 4 > s->data_end) {
+ return;
+ }
+
*(uint32_t *)p = le32_to_cpu(val);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;
@@ -2084,6 +2096,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
}
p = s->data_ptr;
+ if (p + 4 > s->data_end) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
ret = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)p);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;
--
1.8.3.1
From aa851d30acfbb9580098ac1dc82885530cb8b3c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:17:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ide/atapi: Fix START STOP UNIT command completion
The command must be completed on all code paths. START STOP UNIT with
pwrcnd set should succeed without doing anything.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
hw/ide/atapi.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/ide/atapi.c b/hw/ide/atapi.c
index 950e311..79dd167 100644
--- a/hw/ide/atapi.c
+++ b/hw/ide/atapi.c
@@ -983,6 +983,7 @@ static void cmd_start_stop_unit(IDEState *s, uint8_t* buf)
if (pwrcnd) {
/* eject/load only happens for power condition == 0 */
+ ide_atapi_cmd_ok(s);
return;
}
--
1.8.3.1
From 1d3c2268f8708126a34064c2e0c1000b40e6f3e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:41:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ide: Clear DRQ after handling all expected accesses
This is additional hardening against an end_transfer_func that fails to
clear the DRQ status bit. The bit must be unset as soon as the PIO
transfer has completed, so it's better to do this in a central place
instead of duplicating the code in all commands (and forgetting it in
some).
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
hw/ide/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/ide/core.c b/hw/ide/core.c
index 44fcc23..50449ca 100644
--- a/hw/ide/core.c
+++ b/hw/ide/core.c
@@ -2028,8 +2028,10 @@ void ide_data_writew(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
*(uint16_t *)p = le16_to_cpu(val);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
- if (p >= s->data_end)
+ if (p >= s->data_end) {
+ s->status &= ~DRQ_STAT;
s->end_transfer_func(s);
+ }
}
uint32_t ide_data_readw(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
@@ -2053,8 +2055,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readw(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
ret = cpu_to_le16(*(uint16_t *)p);
p += 2;
s->data_ptr = p;
- if (p >= s->data_end)
+ if (p >= s->data_end) {
+ s->status &= ~DRQ_STAT;
s->end_transfer_func(s);
+ }
return ret;
}
@@ -2078,8 +2082,10 @@ void ide_data_writel(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t val)
*(uint32_t *)p = le32_to_cpu(val);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;
- if (p >= s->data_end)
+ if (p >= s->data_end) {
+ s->status &= ~DRQ_STAT;
s->end_transfer_func(s);
+ }
}
uint32_t ide_data_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
@@ -2103,8 +2109,10 @@ uint32_t ide_data_readl(void *opaque, uint32_t addr)
ret = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)p);
p += 4;
s->data_ptr = p;
- if (p >= s->data_end)
+ if (p >= s->data_end) {
+ s->status &= ~DRQ_STAT;
s->end_transfer_func(s);
+ }
return ret;
}
--
1.8.3.1
|
