blob: 1a962e1610144dff1bc89ed296b30334aa32a986 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
From patchwork Thu Jun 24 05:45:19 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: xfrm: check bundle policy existance before dereferencing it
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:45:19 -0000
From: =?utf-8?b?VGltbyBUZXLDpHMgPHRpbW8udGVyYXNAaWtpLmZpPg==?=
X-Patchwork-Id: 56759
Message-Id: <1277358319-9868-1-git-send-email-timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
"John W.Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net
Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Timo=20Ter=C3=A4s?= <timo.teras@iki.fi>
Fix the bundle validation code to not assume having a valid policy.
When we have multiple transformations for a xfrm policy, the bundle
instance will be a chain of bundles with only the first one having
the policy reference. When policy_genid is bumped it will expire the
first bundle in the chain which is equivalent of expiring the whole
chain.
Reported-bisected-and-tested-by: Justin P. Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 4bf27d9..af1c173 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -2300,7 +2300,8 @@ int xfrm_bundle_ok(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_dst *first,
return 0;
if (xdst->xfrm_genid != dst->xfrm->genid)
return 0;
- if (xdst->policy_genid != atomic_read(&xdst->pols[0]->genid))
+ if (xdst->num_pols > 0 &&
+ xdst->policy_genid != atomic_read(&xdst->pols[0]->genid))
return 0;
if (strict && fl &&
|
