kunkku/aports - kunkku's aports repo

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	[various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDX	Jakub Jirutka	2017-12-30	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
*	main/flex: fix cross-compiling	A. Wilcox	2017-08-28	1	-1/+3
\|
*	main/[various]: fix trailing whitespace	tmpfile	2017-07-10	1	-1/+1
\|
*	main/flex - updated flex to 2.6.4	Arch3y	2017-05-10	2	-37/+14
\| \| \| \| \|	Added check function and updated to 2.6.4 This will fix build issues with unbound
*	main/flex: fix yywrap problem	William Pitcock	2017-03-25	2	-5/+32
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.6.3	Natanael Copa	2017-01-03	1	-5/+5
\|
*	Revert "main/flex: upgrade to 2.6.2"	Timo Teräs	2016-11-01	1	-5/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	This partially reverts commit 2dfc72bae7dce5a6afc0299d901226bde290f8f2. flex 2.6.2 is broken horribly causing build failures in various packages. For details: https://github.com/westes/flex/issues/113
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.6.2	Sören Tempel	2016-10-25	1	-14/+10
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.6.1	Natanael Copa	2016-08-08	1	-6/+6
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.6.0	Natanael Copa	2016-01-23	1	-8/+7
\|
*	main/flex: create compatibility symlink (/usr/bin/lex)	Sören Tempel	2015-11-12	1	-1/+2
\| \| \| \| \|	This symlink is for instance used by the default GNU Make rule for *.l files. Other distributions like arch linux also create this symlink.
*	Do not delete *.la files manually	Bartłomiej Piotrowski	2015-09-10	1	-1/+0
\| \| \| \| \|	Since abuild v2.22.0, these are removed automatically unless 'libtool' option has been specified.
*	main/flex: fix depends for -dev	Natanael Copa	2015-06-05	1	-1/+2
\| \| \| \|	we will most likely want flex itself when using flex-dev
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.5.39	Natanael Copa	2014-03-27	1	-6/+8
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.5.38	Natanael Copa	2014-02-17	1	-4/+7
\|
*	main/[various]: simple build fixes against musl (update_config_sub)	Timo Teräs	2013-09-20	1	-0/+5
\|
*	[all autotools packages]: normalize ./configure	Timo Teräs	2013-07-30	1	-4/+6
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.5.37	Bartłomiej Piotrowski	2012-08-04	1	-2/+2
\|
*	main/flex: upgrade to 2.5.36	Natanael Copa	2012-07-24	1	-3/+7
\|
*	main: mass-rebuild of packages missing arch in .PKGINFO	Natanael Copa	2011-03-31	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \|	this is needed for apk-tools-2.1 migration
*	main/flex: cross-compile support	William Pitcock	2011-02-26	1	-0/+2
\|
*	Set all packages with arch="x86 x86_64" to arch="all".	William Pitcock	2011-01-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	main/*: add arch	Natanael Copa	2010-12-13	1	-0/+1
\|
*	main/[various]: bump pkgrel to force rebuild against nptl	Natanael Copa	2010-05-04	1	-1/+1
\|
*	move core/* to main/	Natanael Copa	2009-07-23	1	-0/+23
	added maintainer to several packages as well