aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/testing/softhsm
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* testing/softhsm: enable armhftcely2018-04-231-1/+1
| | | Revert 9d13149200e831719789924508249cc07699f652.
* testing/softhsm: disable on armhf due to botan depNatanael Copa2018-04-181-1/+1
|
* testing/softhsm: fix test failure on x86tcely2018-04-132-4/+20
| | | | | The conversion of an int to long long for some reason caused this test failure. Why this is not also a problem on x86_64 is still a mystery to me.
* testing/softhsm: upgrade to 2.4.0tcely2018-04-102-85/+23
|
* testing/softhsm: rebuild against libressl-2.7Natanael Copa2018-04-061-1/+1
|
* [various]: unify names of licenses according to SPDXJakub Jirutka2017-12-301-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This commit updates $license variable in all APKBUILDs to comply with short names specified by SPDX version 3.0 [1] where possible. It was done using find-and-replace method on substrings inside $license variables. Only license names were updated, not "expressions" specifying relation between the licenses (e.g. "X and Y", "X or Y", "X and (Y or Z)") or exceptions (e.g. "X with exceptions"). Many licenses have a version or multiple variants, e.g. MPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause. However, $license in many aports do not contain license version or variant. Since there's no way how to infer this information just from abuild, it were left without the variant suffix or version, i.e. non SPDX compliant. GNU licenses (AGPL, GFDL, GPL, LGPL) are especially complicated. They exist in two variants: -only (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0) and -or-later (formerly e.g. GPL-2.0+). We did not systematically noted distinguish between these variants, so GPL-2.0, GPL2, GPLv2 etc. may mean GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. Thus GNU licenses without "+" (e.g. GPL2+) were left without the variant suffix, i.e. non SPDX compliant. Note: This commit just fixes format of the license names, no verification has been done if the specified license information is actually correct! [1]: https://spdx.org/licenses/
* testing/[various]: rebuild against libressl-2.6Natanael Copa2017-11-101-1/+1
|
* testing/softhsm: new aportFrank Felhoffer2017-09-032-0/+108
http://www.softhsm.org/ cryptographic store accessible through a PKCS #11