1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
|
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Subject: gnttab: fix transitive grant handling
Processing of transitive grants must not use the fast path, or else
reference counting breaks due to the skipped recursive call to
__acquire_grant_for_copy() (its __release_grant_for_copy()
counterpart occurs independent of original pin count). Furthermore
after re-acquiring temporarily dropped locks we need to verify no grant
properties changed if the original pin count was non-zero; checking
just the pin counts is sufficient only for well-behaved guests. As a
result, __release_grant_for_copy() needs to mirror that new behavior.
Furthermore a __release_grant_for_copy() invocation was missing on the
retry path of __acquire_grant_for_copy(), and gnttab_set_version() also
needs to bail out upon encountering a transitive grant.
This is part of CVE-2017-12135 / XSA-226.
Reported-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
--- a/xen/common/grant_table.c
+++ b/xen/common/grant_table.c
@@ -2050,13 +2050,8 @@ __release_grant_for_copy(
unsigned long r_frame;
uint16_t *status;
grant_ref_t trans_gref;
- int released_read;
- int released_write;
struct domain *td;
- released_read = 0;
- released_write = 0;
-
grant_read_lock(rgt);
act = active_entry_acquire(rgt, gref);
@@ -2086,17 +2081,11 @@ __release_grant_for_copy(
act->pin -= GNTPIN_hstw_inc;
if ( !(act->pin & (GNTPIN_devw_mask|GNTPIN_hstw_mask)) )
- {
- released_write = 1;
gnttab_clear_flag(_GTF_writing, status);
- }
}
if ( !act->pin )
- {
gnttab_clear_flag(_GTF_reading, status);
- released_read = 1;
- }
active_entry_release(act);
grant_read_unlock(rgt);
@@ -2104,13 +2093,10 @@ __release_grant_for_copy(
if ( td != rd )
{
/*
- * Recursive calls, but they're bounded (acquire permits only a single
+ * Recursive call, but it is bounded (acquire permits only a single
* level of transitivity), so it's okay.
*/
- if ( released_write )
- __release_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, 0);
- else if ( released_read )
- __release_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, 1);
+ __release_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, readonly);
rcu_unlock_domain(td);
}
@@ -2184,8 +2170,108 @@ __acquire_grant_for_copy(
act->domid, ldom, act->pin);
old_pin = act->pin;
- if ( !act->pin ||
- (!readonly && !(act->pin & (GNTPIN_devw_mask|GNTPIN_hstw_mask))) )
+ if ( sha2 && (shah->flags & GTF_type_mask) == GTF_transitive )
+ {
+ if ( (!old_pin || (!readonly &&
+ !(old_pin & (GNTPIN_devw_mask|GNTPIN_hstw_mask)))) &&
+ (rc = _set_status_v2(ldom, readonly, 0, shah, act,
+ status)) != GNTST_okay )
+ goto unlock_out;
+
+ if ( !allow_transitive )
+ PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
+ "transitive grant when transitivity not allowed\n");
+
+ trans_domid = sha2->transitive.trans_domid;
+ trans_gref = sha2->transitive.gref;
+ barrier(); /* Stop the compiler from re-loading
+ trans_domid from shared memory */
+ if ( trans_domid == rd->domain_id )
+ PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
+ "transitive grants cannot be self-referential\n");
+
+ /*
+ * We allow the trans_domid == ldom case, which corresponds to a
+ * grant being issued by one domain, sent to another one, and then
+ * transitively granted back to the original domain. Allowing it
+ * is easy, and means that you don't need to go out of your way to
+ * avoid it in the guest.
+ */
+
+ /* We need to leave the rrd locked during the grant copy. */
+ td = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(trans_domid);
+ if ( td == NULL )
+ PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
+ "transitive grant referenced bad domain %d\n",
+ trans_domid);
+
+ /*
+ * __acquire_grant_for_copy() could take the lock on the
+ * remote table (if rd == td), so we have to drop the lock
+ * here and reacquire.
+ */
+ active_entry_release(act);
+ grant_read_unlock(rgt);
+
+ rc = __acquire_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, rd->domain_id,
+ readonly, &grant_frame, page,
+ &trans_page_off, &trans_length, 0);
+
+ grant_read_lock(rgt);
+ act = active_entry_acquire(rgt, gref);
+
+ if ( rc != GNTST_okay )
+ {
+ __fixup_status_for_copy_pin(act, status);
+ rcu_unlock_domain(td);
+ active_entry_release(act);
+ grant_read_unlock(rgt);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We dropped the lock, so we have to check that the grant didn't
+ * change, and that nobody else tried to pin/unpin it. If anything
+ * changed, just give up and tell the caller to retry.
+ */
+ if ( rgt->gt_version != 2 ||
+ act->pin != old_pin ||
+ (old_pin && (act->domid != ldom || act->frame != grant_frame ||
+ act->start != trans_page_off ||
+ act->length != trans_length ||
+ act->trans_domain != td ||
+ act->trans_gref != trans_gref ||
+ !act->is_sub_page)) )
+ {
+ __release_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, readonly);
+ __fixup_status_for_copy_pin(act, status);
+ rcu_unlock_domain(td);
+ active_entry_release(act);
+ grant_read_unlock(rgt);
+ put_page(*page);
+ *page = NULL;
+ return ERESTART;
+ }
+
+ if ( !old_pin )
+ {
+ act->domid = ldom;
+ act->start = trans_page_off;
+ act->length = trans_length;
+ act->trans_domain = td;
+ act->trans_gref = trans_gref;
+ act->frame = grant_frame;
+ act->gfn = -1ul;
+ /*
+ * The actual remote remote grant may or may not be a sub-page,
+ * but we always treat it as one because that blocks mappings of
+ * transitive grants.
+ */
+ act->is_sub_page = 1;
+ }
+ }
+ else if ( !old_pin ||
+ (!readonly && !(old_pin & (GNTPIN_devw_mask|GNTPIN_hstw_mask))) )
{
if ( (rc = _set_status(rgt->gt_version, ldom,
readonly, 0, shah, act,
@@ -2206,79 +2292,6 @@ __acquire_grant_for_copy(
trans_page_off = 0;
trans_length = PAGE_SIZE;
}
- else if ( (shah->flags & GTF_type_mask) == GTF_transitive )
- {
- if ( !allow_transitive )
- PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
- "transitive grant when transitivity not allowed\n");
-
- trans_domid = sha2->transitive.trans_domid;
- trans_gref = sha2->transitive.gref;
- barrier(); /* Stop the compiler from re-loading
- trans_domid from shared memory */
- if ( trans_domid == rd->domain_id )
- PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
- "transitive grants cannot be self-referential\n");
-
- /* We allow the trans_domid == ldom case, which
- corresponds to a grant being issued by one domain, sent
- to another one, and then transitively granted back to
- the original domain. Allowing it is easy, and means
- that you don't need to go out of your way to avoid it
- in the guest. */
-
- /* We need to leave the rrd locked during the grant copy */
- td = rcu_lock_domain_by_id(trans_domid);
- if ( td == NULL )
- PIN_FAIL(unlock_out_clear, GNTST_general_error,
- "transitive grant referenced bad domain %d\n",
- trans_domid);
-
- /*
- * __acquire_grant_for_copy() could take the lock on the
- * remote table (if rd == td), so we have to drop the lock
- * here and reacquire
- */
- active_entry_release(act);
- grant_read_unlock(rgt);
-
- rc = __acquire_grant_for_copy(td, trans_gref, rd->domain_id,
- readonly, &grant_frame, page,
- &trans_page_off, &trans_length, 0);
-
- grant_read_lock(rgt);
- act = active_entry_acquire(rgt, gref);
-
- if ( rc != GNTST_okay ) {
- __fixup_status_for_copy_pin(act, status);
- rcu_unlock_domain(td);
- active_entry_release(act);
- grant_read_unlock(rgt);
- return rc;
- }
-
- /*
- * We dropped the lock, so we have to check that nobody else tried
- * to pin (or, for that matter, unpin) the reference in *this*
- * domain. If they did, just give up and tell the caller to retry.
- */
- if ( act->pin != old_pin )
- {
- __fixup_status_for_copy_pin(act, status);
- rcu_unlock_domain(td);
- active_entry_release(act);
- grant_read_unlock(rgt);
- put_page(*page);
- *page = NULL;
- return ERESTART;
- }
-
- /* The actual remote remote grant may or may not be a
- sub-page, but we always treat it as one because that
- blocks mappings of transitive grants. */
- is_sub_page = 1;
- act->gfn = -1ul;
- }
else if ( !(sha2->hdr.flags & GTF_sub_page) )
{
rc = __get_paged_frame(sha2->full_page.frame, &grant_frame, page, readonly, rd);
@@ -2710,10 +2723,13 @@ gnttab_set_version(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARA
case 2:
for ( i = 0; i < GNTTAB_NR_RESERVED_ENTRIES; i++ )
{
- if ( ((shared_entry_v2(gt, i).hdr.flags & GTF_type_mask) ==
- GTF_permit_access) &&
- (shared_entry_v2(gt, i).full_page.frame >> 32) )
+ switch ( shared_entry_v2(gt, i).hdr.flags & GTF_type_mask )
{
+ case GTF_permit_access:
+ if ( !(shared_entry_v2(gt, i).full_page.frame >> 32) )
+ break;
+ /* fall through */
+ case GTF_transitive:
gdprintk(XENLOG_WARNING,
"tried to change grant table version to 1 with non-representable entries\n");
res = -ERANGE;
|
