Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
... | ||||||
* | Route (reject|blackhole) support from 6Wind patch. | hasso | 2003-05-25 | 1 | -35/+11 | |
| | ||||||
* | From: Gilad Arnold <gilad.arnold@terayon.com> | paul | 2003-05-16 | 1 | -3/+3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | Subject: [zebra 19084] Re: suspected memory leakage upon static route I believe this is a more complete patch, it also addresses allocating/freeing of nexthop->ifname string buffer (1) using XSTRDUP/XFREE macros (thus correctly updating memory statistics), and (2) for all nexthop->type cases that carry an ifname string. | |||||
* | From: Gilad Arnold <gilad arnold at terayon com> | paul | 2003-05-14 | 1 | -0/+4 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subject: [zebra 19080] suspected memory leakage upon static route deletion upon deletion of a static route entry, at the end of zebra/zebra_rib.c/static_delete_ipv4(), there's a call to XFREE to deallocate the 'struct static_ipv4'. However, in the case of a static with ifname as nexthop (type==STATIC_IPV4_IFNAME), this struct holds a pointer to a dynamically allocated ifname string buffer (si->gate.ifname, see its allocation within static_add_ipv4() using XSTRDUP). IMO, the attached patch is required. Notes: the same applies to IPv6 statics as well (fix included in patch); and, I admit I haven't yet tested that, but it seems simple enough to be working... ;-> | |||||
* | Matthew Grant <grantma@anathoth.gen.nz>patch_z17290_ifupstaticfix | paul | 2003-01-22 | 1 | -1/+19 | |
| | | | | | | Subject: [zebra 17290] [PATCHES] - Fixes for problems in 0.93b Added ifupstaticfix | |||||
* | Initial revision | paul | 2002-12-13 | 1 | -0/+2199 | |