aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch')
-rw-r--r--main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch239
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 239 deletions
diff --git a/main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch b/main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 8c11c53117..0000000000
--- a/main/apk-tools/0006-solver-various-fixes.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,239 +0,0 @@
-From 4dd8c58df9aa2e7821a7d5bb50407033858ed1c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: =?UTF-8?q?Timo=20Ter=C3=A4s?= <timo.teras@iki.fi>
-Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 14:59:48 +0300
-Subject: [PATCH] solver: various fixes
-
- * push_decision expects to always get the package primary 'name'
- as apk_name. ASSERT that and fix problem cases.
- (though - this might need to be reverted, and store the non
- primary name in apk_decision instead to accomodate for better
- backtracking optimizations)
- * fix error reporting of virtual package names
- * make 'assign_name' errors soft. the incorrect packages just are
- no longer consider instead of aborting whole calculation.
- * fix backtracking of virtual packages that are not depended
- directly
----
- src/solver.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
- 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
-
-diff --git a/src/solver.c b/src/solver.c
-index edf1650..3fb7832 100644
---- a/src/solver.c
-+++ b/src/solver.c
-@@ -706,10 +706,14 @@ static inline void assign_name(
- struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name, struct apk_provider p)
- {
- if (p.version == &apk_null_blob) {
-- ASSERT(!name->ss.locked || name->ss.chosen.version == &apk_null_blob,
-- "Assigning locked name with version");
-+ /* Assigning locked name with version is a problem;
-+ * generally package providing same name twice */
-+ if (name->ss.locked && name->ss.chosen.version != &apk_null_blob)
-+ ss->impossible_state = 1;
- } else {
-- ASSERT(!name->ss.locked, "Assigning locked name");
-+ /* Similar to above */
-+ if (name->ss.locked)
-+ ss->impossible_state = 1;
- }
- name->ss.chosen = p;
- name->ss.locked++;
-@@ -721,7 +725,7 @@ static inline void assign_name(
-
- static inline void unassign_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
- {
-- ASSERT(name->ss.locked, "Unassigning unlocked name");
-+ ASSERT(name->ss.locked, "Unassigning unlocked name %s", name->name);
- name->ss.locked--;
- if (name->ss.locked == 0) {
- name->ss.chosen = CHOSEN_NONE;
-@@ -793,7 +797,7 @@ static solver_result_t apply_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- addscore(&ss->score, &score);
-
- name->ss.chosen = CHOSEN_NONE;
-- name->ss.locked = 1;
-+ name->ss.locked++;
- list_del(&name->ss.unsolved_list);
- list_init(&name->ss.unsolved_list);
- } else {
-@@ -847,7 +851,7 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- for (i = 0; i < pkg->provides->num; i++)
- pkg->provides->item[i].name->ss.name_touched = 1;
-
-- if (name->ss.locked) {
-+ if (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) {
- if (ps->handle_install_if)
- foreach_rinstall_if_pkg(ss, pkg, untrigger_install_if);
- foreach_dependency(ss, pkg->depends, undo_constraint);
-@@ -871,12 +875,12 @@ static void undo_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- if (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) {
- get_unassigned_score(name, &score);
- subscore(&ss->score, &score);
-+ name->ss.locked--;
- } else {
- name->ss.none_excluded = 0;
- }
-
- /* Put back the name to unsolved list */
-- name->ss.locked = 0;
- promote_name(ss, name);
- }
- }
-@@ -890,6 +894,9 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- {
- struct apk_decision *d;
-
-+ ASSERT(pkg == NULL || pkg->name == name,
-+ "push_decision got non-primary name: %s != %s",
-+ pkg->name->name, name->name);
- ASSERT(ss->num_decisions <= ss->max_decisions,
- "Decision tree overflow.");
-
-@@ -897,6 +904,8 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- d = &ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions];
-
- #ifdef DEBUG_CHECKS
-+ dbg_printf("Saving score ("SCORE_FMT") and requirers (%d) for %s\n",
-+ SCORE_PRINTF(&ss->score), name->ss.requirers, name->name);
- d->saved_score = ss->score;
- d->saved_requirers = name->ss.requirers;
- #endif
-@@ -911,6 +920,12 @@ static solver_result_t push_decision(struct apk_solver_state *ss,
- d->pkg = pkg;
- d->no_package = 0;
- }
-+ /* FIXME: this is needed for virtual packages - should possible
-+ * consider making backtracking information also keep the
-+ * virtual apk_name causing the touched information to be more
-+ * accurate */
-+ if (name->ss.last_touched_decision == 0)
-+ name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
-
- return apply_decision(ss, d);
- }
-@@ -931,8 +946,8 @@ static int next_branch(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
- SCORE_PRINTF(&d->saved_score),
- SCORE_PRINTF(&ss->score));
- ASSERT(d->saved_requirers == name->ss.requirers,
-- "Requirers not restored between decisions (%s)",
-- name->name);
-+ "Requirers not restored between decisions (%s), %d != %d",
-+ name->name, d->saved_requirers, name->ss.requirers);
- #endif
-
- if (backup_until >= ss->num_decisions &&
-@@ -940,6 +955,10 @@ static int next_branch(struct apk_solver_state *ss)
- d->branching_point = BRANCH_NO;
- d->type = (d->type == DECISION_ASSIGN) ? DECISION_EXCLUDE : DECISION_ASSIGN;
- return apply_decision(ss, d);
-+ } else {
-+ if (d->branching_point == BRANCH_YES)
-+ dbg_printf("skipping %s, %d < %d\n",
-+ name->name, backup_until, ss->num_decisions);
- }
-
- if (d->no_package && !d->found_solution) {
-@@ -963,11 +982,15 @@ static void apply_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency
- if (ss->num_decisions > 0) {
- requirer_name = decision_to_name(&ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions]);
- requirer_pkg = decision_to_pkg(&ss->decisions[ss->num_decisions]);
-+ /* FIXME: should probably take into account the requirer
-+ * package's provided name's 'requirer strength' */
- strength = requirer_name->ss.requirers ?: 1;
- } else {
- strength = 1;
- }
-
-+ dbg_printf("--->apply_constraint: %s (strength %d)\n", name->name, strength);
-+
- if (name->ss.locked) {
- if (name->ss.chosen.pkg)
- dbg_printf("%s: locked to " PKG_VER_FMT " already\n",
-@@ -1021,8 +1044,10 @@ static void apply_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency
- if (changed)
- name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
-
-- if (!dep->conflict)
-+ if (!dep->conflict) {
-+ dbg_printf("%s requirers += %d\n", name->name, strength);
- name->ss.requirers += strength;
-+ }
-
- promote_name(ss, name);
- }
-@@ -1041,6 +1066,8 @@ static void undo_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency *
- strength = 1;
- }
-
-+ dbg_printf("--->undo_constraint: %s (strength %d)\n", name->name, strength);
-+
- if (name->ss.locked) {
- if (name->ss.chosen.pkg != NULL) {
- dbg_printf(PKG_VER_FMT " selected already for %s\n",
-@@ -1091,8 +1118,16 @@ static void undo_constraint(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_dependency *
- if (name->ss.last_touched_decision > ss->num_decisions)
- name->ss.last_touched_decision = ss->num_decisions;
-
-- if (!dep->conflict)
-+ if (requirer_name && requirer_name->ss.requirers != strength) {
-+ dbg_printf("requirer %s, dependency %s: strength mismatch %d != %d\n",
-+ requirer_name->name, name->name,
-+ requirer_name->ss.requirers, strength);
-+ }
-+
-+ if (!dep->conflict) {
- name->ss.requirers -= strength;
-+ dbg_printf("%s requirers -= %d\n", name->name, strength);
-+ }
-
- demote_name(ss, name);
- }
-@@ -1144,7 +1179,7 @@ static int reconsider_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
-
- /* viable alternative? */
- if (cmpscore2(&ss->score, &pkg0_score, &ss->best_score) >= 0)
-- return push_decision(ss, name, pkg0, DECISION_EXCLUDE, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
-+ return push_decision(ss, pkg0->name, pkg0, DECISION_EXCLUDE, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
-
- if (cmpscore(&pkg0_score, &best_score) < 0) {
- best_score = pkg0_score;
-@@ -1169,9 +1204,10 @@ static int reconsider_name(struct apk_solver_state *ss, struct apk_name *name)
- return SOLVERR_PRUNED;
- return push_decision(ss, name, NULL, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
- } else if (options == 1 && score_locked && name->ss.none_excluded && name == next_p->pkg->name) {
-+ struct apk_package *pkg0 = next_p->pkg;
- dbg_printf("reconsider_name: %s: only one choice left with known score, locking.\n",
- name->name);
-- return push_decision(ss, name, next_p->pkg, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
-+ return push_decision(ss, pkg0->name, pkg0, DECISION_ASSIGN, BRANCH_NO, FALSE);
- }
-
- name->ss.chosen = *next_p;
-@@ -1916,7 +1952,10 @@ static void print_dep_errors(struct apk_database *db, char *label,
-
- for (i = 0; i < deps->num; i++) {
- struct apk_dependency *dep = &deps->item[i];
-- struct apk_package *pkg = (struct apk_package*) dep->name->state_ptr;
-+ struct apk_package *pkg = NULL;
-+
-+ if (dep->name->state_int != 1)
-+ pkg = (struct apk_package*) dep->name->state_ptr;
-
- if (apk_dep_is_materialized_or_provided(dep, pkg))
- continue;
-@@ -1953,6 +1992,11 @@ void apk_solver_print_errors(struct apk_database *db,
- for (i = 0; i < solution->num; i++) {
- struct apk_package *pkg = solution->item[i].pkg;
- pkg->name->state_ptr = pkg;
-+ for (j = 0; j < pkg->provides->num; j++) {
-+ if (pkg->provides->item[j].version == &apk_null_blob)
-+ continue;
-+ pkg->provides->item[j].name->state_ptr = pkg;
-+ }
- }
-
- print_dep_errors(db, "world", world, &names);
---
-1.7.12.2
-