uClibc-alpine - Where we track our uclibc patches

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	posix_fadvise64: fix x86 implementation	Timo Teräs	2011-05-07	1	-1/+3
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Commit 73d59554144f429b1cf0d4d7fa7de42bdf59ad92 completely broke the x86 implementation of posix_fadvise64. It moved the first the assembly code retn instruction gets missing depending on the Technically the file has two implementaions for posix_fadvise64, one when __NR_fadvise64_64 is available, and second one if only __NR_fadvise64 is there. Fix the #ifdef's to be proper for that. Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
*	unify stub logic	Mike Frysinger	2011-02-24	1	-5/+4
\| \| \| \|	Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
*	Remove __libc_posix_fadvise[64] alias. It existed on i386 and arm only,	Denis Vlasenko	2008-12-15	1	-9/+17
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	and google says only uclibc has it, no users at all. text data bss dec hex filename - 229374 1367 11280 242021 3b165 lib/libuClibc-0.9.30-svn.so + 229347 1367 11280 241994 3b14a lib/libuClibc-0.9.30-svn.so
*	- now passes all LTP tests	Bernhard Reutner-Fischer	2008-09-29	1	-23/+22
\|
*	- fix !LFS case for i386	Bernhard Reutner-Fischer	2008-09-25	1	-5/+8
\|
*	- take LFS into account and add fallback via fadvise64	Bernhard Reutner-Fischer	2008-09-19	1	-4/+34
\|
*	- posix_fadvise64 for i386	Bernhard Reutner-Fischer	2008-09-19	1	-0/+68